A recent paper in Child Development has caused concern by alleging a causative connection between non-ionizing radiation (W-Fi) and a host of conditions, including autism and cancer. In this work, we outline why these claims are devoid of merit, and why they should not have been given a scientific veneer of legitimacy. We also outline some hallmarks of potentially dubious science, with the hope that authors, reviews and editors might be better able to avoid suspect scientific claims.
Read the paper here.
